randy - 27 November 2007 12:58 AM
I’m thinking of pickingup some image stabilizing binos this winter. I would use them for finding kelp offshore. If I could increase my success by 25% or more that would mean that many more shots. I am always amazed and how intently I can be watching but still have my mind wander and almost run over a patty. I’m thinking the lower powred models might actually be better because they give a greater field of vision and I’m not interested in detail at great distances. I found some Nikons for 700 dollars. Any thoughts/
Randy
Every little bit helps, but I’m not sure it would help me much in my boat, because I am too low to the water. The more I do this, the more convinced I am that I am missing the close paddies simply because of swell/chop. Being higher up, like in your or Scott’s boat, might benefit more from having stabilized binos. Heck, being higher up is an advantage by itself.
The sort of defacto standard in low-end image-stabilized binos have been the Fujinon Stabiscopes, but they are more towards $900 for the Stabi-jrs. Canon also has some, but they are also a bit more pricey.
The best are supposed to be the gyro-stabilized binos like the Fraser-Volpes, but now you’re talking thousands of dollars, plus they’re big and take a lot of power.